Grameenphone requests BTRC to withdraw the unfounded and illegal audit demand

Grameenphone Ltd. yesterday, in a letter to the Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission (BTRC), has labeled the regulator’s recent audit demand of BDT 12,579.95 crore as “unfounded and without any legal basis.” The operator has requested that the demand be withdrawn and also requested discussions with a view to find an amicable resolution.

On 2 April 2019, BTRChad issued a demand against GP of BDT 8,494.01 croreto the telecom regulator and BDT 4,085.94 crore to the National Board of Revenue (NBR) within a period of 10 (ten) working days. The claim originated from an Information and Systems Audit, conducted by the JVCA of Toha Khan Zaman & Co.,on GP’s operations from inception in 1997 till December, 2014.Approximately BDT 6,194.3 crore, or nearly 73%, of the BDT 8494.01 crore claimed on behalf of BTRC, is the interest amount being charged up to December 2017.

Earlier, BTRC had raised another claim against Grameenphone for BDT 3,034 crore from a previous Information and System Audit conducted by another auditor for the period of 1997 to 2011. Subsequently, the Hon’ble Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladeshdeclared the appointment of that auditor as illegal. Notably, BTRC continues to defend the earlier demand for the period of 1997-2011 at court, while now raising a claim of BDT 12,579.95 crore for the period 1997-2014. As it stands, the present demand made by the BTRC overlaps the period 1997 to 2011.

“Despite numerous interactions with the Regulator and extending our full cooperation to the auditors, it is very unfortunate to note that the demand did not reflect our responses. Throughout the entire audit process we have consistently pointed out the flaws in this audit exercise; however, our observations have gone unheeded,” said Grameenphone CEO, Michael Foley.

In August 2018, BTRC requested for a formal response from GP on the audit findings, and accordingly GP had responded in detail in September 2018 within their timeline. However, the BTRC demand letter states that only responses made up till February 2018 were considered.

With regard to NBR portion of the demand (representing approximately 32% of the total claim), GP also pointed out that BTRC has no authority to raise any demand on behalf of NBR.

GP reiterates its request to BTRC to withdraw the demand and to engage in discussions with a view to find an amicable resolution.

Tech and Teen

Recent Posts

TECNO secures its spot among top 10 global smartphone brands

TECNO, a global innovative technology brand, has been named as one of the 10 global…

6 days ago

vivo X200 smartphone: equipped with a powerful chipset and seamless multitasking

The flagship X series smartphone, vivo X200, has become a hot topic nationwide as the…

1 week ago

Walton Plaza Challengers Summit-2025 held

With the slogan of “We were the best, we are the best and we will…

1 week ago

FICCI expresses concerns over lack of stakeholder consultation prior to policy revision

The Foreign Investors’ Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FICCI) Bangladesh, the apex chamber representing Foreign…

1 week ago

AmbuFast.com: Bangladesh’s First 100% Online Ambulance Booking Service Launches January 23, 2025

The growing demand for ambulance services in Bangladesh is often hindered by inefficiencies, including delays,…

1 week ago

Kaspersky explores 2025 potential IT outage and supply chain risk scenarios

As part of its annual Kaspersky Security Bulletin, the company’s experts have analyzed significant supply…

3 weeks ago